At the beginning of July, the second batch of C-NCAP collision results were released in 2014. All seven models received a five-star rating. The first models of the first batch of crash tests were only evaluated by Samsung in the hippocampus, and the other 10 models were awarded five stars. .
Two batches of 18 models, 17 models received five-star evaluation, and the high proportion of five-star evaluation made people have a "new understanding" of the safety performance of domestic models. And can this new understanding be interpreted as "the safety performance of domestically produced vehicles has advanced by leaps and bounds, reaching a high level, and most domestically produced models have reached such high levels?" It also takes time to test.
To examine the improvement of car safety performance, we must not be separated from the overall level of the current automotive industry. Although the overall level of China's auto industry has made great progress compared with the previous ones, compared with the developed countries, there is still a big gap. In the face of reality, there seem to be many doubts about the numerous “five-star carsâ€.
The emergence of so many "five-star cars" is nothing more than two possibilities - or the safety performance of domestically produced vehicles has indeed reached the five-star evaluation standard, or the evaluation criteria are too broad and the screening function is insufficient. In fact, it should be the superposition of the above two factors, which has made the situation of the “five-star car gatheredâ€. Many "five-star cars" have lost the original reputation and gold content of the five-star evaluation, and also reduced a measure of consumer car selection. In the long run, it can only be reduced to a show.
However, vehicle safety evaluation systems are still needed, consumers need more product measurement standards, and safety evaluation standards are particularly important. Since there is a need, under the premise of too many "five-star cars", we can only raise the standard. We can set six stars and seven stars. Of course, this is not rigorous, but it is necessary to open the product evaluation level, because only comparison, Only when there is a high level, all five stars will lead to a weakening of the meaning of evaluation. Secondly, it is possible to raise the evaluation criteria and make the five-star evaluation a symbol of a few products, which can further highlight the gold content of the five-star evaluation. Then there is the need to reduce the weight of the bonus points. In the current C-NCAP evaluation system, some security configurations can get extra points, reduce the weight of the plus points, and can return the evaluation to the original meaning of the crash test. direct.
According to the experience of the mature automobile market, vehicle crash test is an important part of the car safety evaluation system and has a positive effect on improving car safety. Our current safety evaluation system should continue to be refined. For example, vehicle selection can be more comprehensive and representative, not only to choose high-equipped models, but also to choose low-profile models. In addition, the safety evaluation system should give people an "extremely demanding" impression, and the score should be more precise, and it is necessary to "give points like gold."
The establishment and wide recognition of an evaluation system requires a process, and requires a scientifically rigorous attitude and a sound process.
Plastic 3D Printing
Plastic 3D Printing,3D Printing Prototype,3D Printer Plastic,Professional 3D Printing Services
Ningbo Jiongke Technology Co., Ltd , https://www.processingmfg.com